Each iteration invents new practices and new writings of philosophy. Ours must have been in a position to introduce convinced mutations that may at the very least be similar with these of cubism, summary paintings, and twelve-tone serialism: it has purely partly performed so. yet in spite of everything the deconstructions, after Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and Derrida, this call for takes on a distinct measurement: What can we do with philosophy itself? How can we globally swap our relation to this notion, which retains indicating that it's more and more conservative and repetitive? those questions jointly have caused what we name “non-philosophy.”
Non-philosophy isn't the negation of philosophy. it's the suspension of philosophy’s declare to imagine the true (Principle of enough Philosophy), and it's the invention of recent usages of idea and language that disrupt the rational narrative of the genuine, that's accurately what each philosophy is. Non-philosophy may still otherwise be understood à l. a. the “non-Euclidean,” specifically, as a generalization of the philosophical past its conventional obstacle through the unitary or “Heraclitean” postulate. From then on, an enormous variety of philosophical judgements which are not together specific will correspond with any actual phenomenon.
Philosophy and Non-Philosophy is broadly thought of the 1st totally specific elaboration of non-philosophy and one in all its most crucial introductory texts.